Your team is always behind on test automation. It doesn't have to stay that way.
For engineering leaders and QA teams shipping faster than their automation can keep up.
Urgent manual testing keeps pulling your engineers off coverage. We fix that — a structured pipeline where AI does the heavy lifting and your experts sign off at every gate that matters.
Sound familiar? It's the same story on every QA team.
Coverage is the first thing to slip when a sprint gets tight — and the hardest thing to catch back up on.
Sprints close with zero new coverage
Automation is always the line item that gets cut when there “wasn't time.” Debt compounds, sprint after sprint.
Manual regression eats days — and still misses
Days of repetitive clicking before every release, and the edge cases that actually break production slip through anyway.
Your best engineers are stuck executing
Senior QA talent running test scripts by hand instead of designing the systems that would make it unnecessary.
From requirements to a running test suite. In a day.
Six stages — five AI-driven, two human review gates. Click any stage to see exactly what goes in, what comes out, and what it produces. Nothing reaches your codebase without an expert sign-off.
Feature analysis
AITakes your inputs — Jira tickets, Figma designs, existing test cases — and produces a structured analysis: what needs testing, where the coverage gaps are, which flows are reusable, and what's still unknown.
Coverage stops being the thing that slips.
Start with an assessment. Scale from there.
A fixed-scope assessment is the lowest-risk first step — and it pays for itself in the roadmap alone. Larger engagements are scoped and quoted after assessment.
A full read on your current testing — coverage gaps, automation bottlenecks, release risks, and AI-readiness. Delivered as a concrete report with a prioritised roadmap, not a slide deck.
- Coverage & risk map — where you're exposed right now
- Automation debt diagnosis — what's slowing your team down
- Tool & process recommendations — specific to your stack
- 30-day remediation roadmap — prioritised and actionable
- Follow-up walkthrough — we present findings and answer questions
Not sure if it's right for you?
Book a call and we'll tell you honestly.
A production-grade Playwright / Cypress framework built to your stack — structured, maintainable, and handed over with your team trained on it.
We embed the full six-stage AI pipeline into your workflow — with human gates wired to your team — so coverage keeps pace on its own.
A senior QA lead embedded part-time — owning strategy, standards and the pipeline so quality has a seat without a full-time hire.
Senior hands for a defined stretch — pairing, unblocking, or a focused push on a hard problem.
What your assessment report includes.
Five concrete deliverables — not a slide deck. Each one is specific to your codebase, your team, and your release pressure.
Current-state coverage map
A clear picture of what's tested, what's not, and where the gaps are highest-risk — mapped against your release cadence.
Automation debt diagnosis
What's slowing your team down — flaky suites, missing abstractions, brittle locators, or framework choices that don't scale.
Quick wins
Specific, actionable improvements your team can ship in the first 30 days — prioritised by effort vs. risk reduction.
Tool & architecture recommendation
A specific recommendation for your stack — not a vendor list. Includes framework choice, CI integration, and test data strategy.
30-day implementation roadmap
A phased plan your team can act on immediately — with clear owners, sequencing, and success criteria for each step.
// Sample output — anonymised. Your report reflects your actual codebase and team.
Built by engineers who lived this exact problem.
Built by two senior QA engineers with 20+ years combined experience across test automation, CI pipelines, regulated delivery, and modern web stacks. We built this methodology for our own team — then realised every QA team is fighting the same fire.
Humans own the decisions
AI drafts; your experts approve. Two mandatory gates mean nothing ambiguous ever reaches your codebase.
Adapts to your tools, not ours
We work inside your stack and coding standards — Playwright, Cypress, Cucumber, Robot Framework, or whatever you run.
Transparent by design
Every stage produces a reviewable artifact. You see the analysis, the scaffold, the locators — never a black box.
Tell us about your QA challenge.
No sales pitch — just a straight conversation about whether we can help, and where we'd start.